End of Tenancy Handover in Singapore: Where Most Disputes Actually Begin

Most tenancies begin smoothly and remain uneventful throughout.
But it is often at the very end—during handover—where things become difficult.

Ending a tenancy sounds simple. Return the keys. Get the deposit back. Move on. But in reality, this is the stage where most misunderstandings and disputes happen — not during the lease, but right at the end.

And it usually comes down to one thing:

👉 Both sides never agreed on what “acceptable condition” really means.

The Real Issue Isn’t Damage — It’s Expectations

Ask any landlord or tenant about a disputed handover, and you will hear two completely different versions of the same story.

The tenant insists they used the unit normally and returned it in good shape. The landlord argues that the place looks worn, dirty, or carelessly handled. Both sides genuinely believe they are being reasonable.

At the heart of this disagreement lies one question:

Is this fair wear and tear, actual damage, or damage due to negligence?

On paper, that distinction sounds straightforward. In practice, it is anything but. What one person considers normal aging of a rental property — a faded spot on the wall, a slightly sticky drawer, a carpet that has lost its freshness — the other sees as avoidable neglect.

The gap is rarely about bad faith. It is about unspoken expectations that only surface on the day of handover, when it is already too late to align them.

Common sources of disagreement include:

• Scuffed floors or faded paint — wear and tear to a tenant, carelessness to a landlord

• Dirty grout or greasy kitchen surfaces — normal use to one, inadequate cleaning to the other

• Small drill holes from picture hooks — easily ignored by tenants, a repair cost to landlords

Handover Doesn’t Start on the Last Day

Most tenants assume that handover begins when the landlord walks through the door on move-out day. That is a costly mistake. A proper handover actually starts two to four weeks before the keys are returned.

During this window, both parties should sit down — or at least exchange a clear message — to revisit the key terms of the tenancy agreement.

At this stage, both landlord and tenant should revisit:

• The Tenancy Agreement
• Cleaning requirements
• Air-conditioning servicing obligations
• Repair responsibilities
• Inventory list

When this step is skipped, the first time expectations are discussed is during the inspection itself. At that point, alignment becomes negotiation, and negotiation under pressure rarely ends well.

A tenant who assumed basic cleaning would suffice suddenly learns that the landlord expects washed curtains and degreased hoods. A landlord who assumed obvious issues would be fixed discovers that the tenant never even noticed them.

Before handover day, both parties should confirm:

• Cleaning requirements beyond basic tidying
• Aircon servicing records and final service
• Repair responsibilities and outstanding issues
• Inventory checklist against current condition

What “Proper Condition” Actually Means

There is a persistent gap between what tenants think “clean enough” means and what landlords expect. Many tenants genuinely believe that a standard wipe-down, vacuum, and mopping will satisfy the handover requirements.

Most landlords, however, expect the unit to be returned close to the condition it was in on day one — which is a significantly higher standard.

This typically includes:

• Curtains washed
• Aircon cleaned and serviced
• Kitchen fully cleaned (including cabinet interiors)
• Appliances cleaned internally and externally
• Hob and hood properly degreased
• Toilets thoroughly cleaned
• Windows, grills, and tracks cleaned
• Fans cleaned (if provided)

In many cases, what the tenant considers a thorough clean is still not enough to meet the landlord’s baseline, and the landlord ends up hiring professional cleaners at the tenant’s expense. Neither party is trying to be difficult. They simply never agreed on what “clean” really meant.

To clear up the ambiguity, a standard, move-in ready handover condition typically requires meeting the following benchmarks:

👉 The Golden Rule: If the goal is to secure a full return of the security deposit, matching the initial baseline is the only foolproof strategy.

Cleaning Expectations: What Is Considered Sufficient?

One of the most common areas of disagreement is cleaning. A common issue arises when the level of cleaning done before handover does not meet expectations.

Engaging a single helper for a few hours is often insufficient for proper handover preparation. A thorough, move-in standard clean typically requires significantly more time and manpower.

In practice, professional deep cleaning often requires multiple cleaners over several hours. Depending on the size and condition of the unit, this may involve multiple cleaners working for half a day or more, with costs starting from around $600 and above, depending on the size of the unit.

At the same time, it is important to recognise that the expected standard should be consistent with the condition at the start of the tenancy.

👉 If the unit was professionally cleaned before the tenant moved in, it is reasonable to expect it to be returned to a similar standard.

👉 If the unit was not handed over in a professionally cleaned condition, the expectation should be aligned accordingly—not elevated beyond what was originally provided.

Without proper alignment on this, what tenants consider “clean” may fall short of what landlords expect. This often results in landlords engaging professional cleaning services again to bring the unit up to the desired standard.

👉 This leads to additional costs that could have been avoided with clearer expectations set at the beginning.

Practical Takeaway

👉 The expected standard of cleaning should match the condition at handover.
👉 A quick or basic clean is rarely sufficient if the unit was originally delivered in a move-in ready condition.

The Handover Inspection: Where Expectations Collide

On the actual handover day, the landlord walks through the unit with the inventory list in hand, comparing what they see now to what was documented at check-in. This is the moment when all those unspoken expectations finally meet reality.

Ideally, both parties are present, and any concerns are raised and clarified immediately. Photos and videos are taken together so there is no dispute later about what the condition actually was.

But all too often, the inspection becomes a tense walkthrough where one party discovers issues the other never anticipated. A missing remote here. A stain on the sofa there. A window track full of dust that should have been cleaned.

By the time the landlord mentions deductions, the tenant feels ambushed. By the time the tenant argues back, the landlord feels disrespected. Neither side is entirely wrong—but neither side is fully aligned either.

To minimise disputes, the standard expectation is simple:

The tenant should return the unit in substantially the same condition it was handed over, excluding fair wear and tear.

That is only fair to the landlord. At the same time, landlords should also recognise that natural ageing and deterioration are unavoidable over time, especially in long-term tenancies. Reasonable allowance should therefore be given for fair wear and tear arising from ordinary use and ageing of the property.

Landlords should also reasonably place themselves in the tenant’s position. In many cases, the items provided at the start of the tenancy may not have been brand new to begin with. As such, the age, existing condition, and remaining lifespan of the item should also be reasonably taken into consideration during handover assessments.

In principle, fair wear and tear is generally part of the natural cost of property ownership and long-term leasing. As landlords benefit from rental income over time, reasonable ageing and deterioration of the property should also be expected and factored into the overall maintenance and upkeep of the unit.

What Is Fair Wear And Tear

Fair wear and tear refers to the natural deterioration of a property, its fixtures, and furnishings resulting from ordinary day-to-day use and the passage of time.

It is expected, unavoidable, and not chargeable to the tenant.

Common Examples:

• Minor paint fading or slight discolouration over time
• Slight fading or ageing of upholstery fabric
• Light scuff marks or minor nail holes on walls
• Slight loosening of door hinges or handles from normal use
• Minor looseness in electrical sockets or switches from prolonged use
• Smell lingering in rooms after long occupancy
• Natural ageing of materials (e.g. hairline cracks in older wood)
• General wear on flooring from regular foot traffic
• Minor scratches on countertops or tabletops from ordinary use
• Fading of curtains or blinds due to sunlight exposure
• Slight yellowing of sealants or grout due to age and humidity
• Mattress or cushion softening from normal use
• Minor laminate peeling or bubbling due to ageing
• Small gaps or expansion and contraction in wooden flooring caused by climate changes
• Slight stiffness in sliding doors or window rollers due to prolonged use
• Slight tarnishing or dullness of metal fittings and taps
• Minor surface rust on older fixtures due to age and humidity
• Light wardrobe or cabinet odour from prolonged storage and occupancy
• Natural deterioration of silicone, rubber seals, or weather strips over time
• Minor ceiling or wall hairline cracks from building settlement
• Slight weakening of drawer runners or cabinet hinges from prolonged normal use

👉 In simple terms:
If an item has naturally deteriorated through ordinary day-to-day living and ageing, it is generally considered fair wear and tear.

Fair wear and tear does not include damage arising from negligence, misuse, poor maintenance, abuse, or intentional acts.

What Is Considered Damage?

Damage refers to physical deterioration beyond normal use.

This is typically chargeable to the tenant, as it requires repair or replacement.

Common Examples:

• Deep scratches or dents on flooring
• Broken fixtures or fittings
• Large stains on walls or surfaces
• Burn marks, water damage, or impact damage
• Water leaking from tap, toilet bowls, etc
• Missing items from the inventory
• Appliances with broken cover or handle

👉 In simple terms:
If it requires repair due to avoidable impact or misuse, it is damage.

What Is Damage Due to Negligence?

This is a more serious category.

Negligence refers to damage caused by failure to properly maintain or take reasonable care of the property.

It may not be sudden — it often builds up over time.

Common Examples:

• Aircon not serviced regularly, leading to leakage or breakdown
• Mold buildup due to poor ventilation or lack of cleaning (Toilet ceiling)
• Grease accumulation in kitchen areas from lack of upkeep
• Ignoring small issues that later become major repairs
• Watermarks, popping up or darkening of parquet flooring due to wet mat
• Marker, crayon, or pen drawings on walls
• Sticker residue, adhesive damage, or peeling paint caused by stickers or tapes

👉 In simple terms:
If the damage could have been prevented with proper care, it is negligence.

Why This Distinction Matters

The challenge is that the same issue can be interpreted differently.

For example:

• A wall mark — wear and tear, or poor maintenance?
• A faulty appliance — age, or misuse?

This is why documentation matters:

• Check-in condition photos
• Inventory list
• Maintenance records

👉 Without evidence, it becomes opinion against opinion.

A Practical Way to Look at It

When assessing any issue, ask:

• Is this caused by time and normal use? → Wear and tear
• Is this caused by an incident or impact? → Damage
• Could this have been avoided with proper care? → Negligence

How Responsibility and Cost Are Determined

Once the nature of the issue is identified, the next step is to determine who is responsible and how much should be paid.

Negligence or misuse determines who bears responsibility, while the minor repair clause helps guide how smaller repair costs are handled.

Most Tenancy Agreements include a minor repair clause, typically requiring the tenant to bear the first $200 to $300 per repair item. This is intended to cover small, day-to-day repair issues without turning every situation into a dispute.

Practical Summary

👉 Wear and tear → Not chargeable
👉 Damage / Negligence → Tenant responsible
👉 Minor repair clause → Applies to small repair costs
👉 Larger or aged items → Must be assessed reasonably

Appliances and the Minor Repair Clause

Appliances naturally deteriorate with age and usage. Fans may become slower, water heaters may become less efficient, and washing machines may experience wear on internal components over time.

The natural ageing of an appliance may be considered fair wear and tear. For example, an older appliance may show cosmetic signs of age, discolouration, minor surface rust, or reduced efficiency over time.

However, once an appliance is no longer functioning as intended, the issue generally moves beyond cosmetic wear and tear and becomes a repair or replacement matter.

For example, a washing machine that no longer drains, a refrigerator that no longer cools, a water heater that no longer heats water, or a fan that no longer operates properly would typically be assessed under the tenancy agreement and any applicable minor repair clause rather than under fair wear and tear.

In most tenancy arrangements, appliances provided in working condition are generally expected to be returned in working condition, subject to the terms of the tenancy agreement and agreed repair responsibilities.

As a result, even where an appliance has aged naturally, tenants may still be responsible for costs up to the agreed minor repair limit if the item was handed over in working condition at the commencement of the tenancy.

Common examples include:

• Fan motor replacement
• Washing machine pump replacement
• Refrigerator thermostat replacement
• Water heater repair

In some situations, an appliance may be beyond economical repair and require replacement instead. Where this occurs, the minor repair clause may still apply, with the tenant bearing the agreed minor repair amount and the landlord bearing the remaining replacement cost.

While tenants may feel this is unfair when an appliance is already several years old, rental properties are rarely handed over with brand-new appliances. In practice, both landlords and tenants accept that fixtures and appliances will have some degree of age and prior usage.

The minor repair clause provides a practical framework for sharing responsibility between landlords and tenants. Rather than requiring landlords to absorb every repair arising during the tenancy, or allowing tenants to avoid all responsibility simply because an item is old, both parties agree upfront on a reasonable threshold for minor repairs and maintenance.

Not Every Situation Is Clear-Cut

While some handover issues are straightforward, others may fall into a grey area where reasonable people disagree.

For example, disputes may arise over whether a particular issue is fair wear and tear, damage caused by misuse, insufficient cleaning, or a repair that falls under the minor repair clause.

Security Deposit and What Happens Next

In Singapore, the security deposit is typically returned within 14 days after handover. However, this timeline assumes that both parties agree on the final condition of the unit. When there is a disagreement, the landlord may make deductions for rectification works or withhold the deposit until the matter is resolved.

In most cases, the amount in dispute is relatively modest — often a few hundred dollars for cleaning or minor repairs, and for larger units, possibly a few thousand. It rarely reaches the equivalent of a full month’s rent.

At this stage, the minor repair clause often comes into play.

The real cost, however, is not the amount itself. It is the time, the stress, and the strain on the landlord-tenant relationship — all of which could have been avoided with clearer expectations set weeks before handover.

At the same time, tenants often experience significant anxiety during this period as well. For many tenants, the security deposit is a substantial sum of money that may already be needed for their next rental, relocation expenses, or personal commitments. When deductions remain unclear or the deposit is withheld for extended periods without proper communication, uncertainty and frustration can quickly build up.

This is why clear communication, proper documentation, and early alignment before handover are important for both parties. The more uncertainty there is after handover, the more emotionally charged the situation can become.

When Expectations Differ Too Much

In some situations, both parties may genuinely disagree on whether an issue falls under fair wear and tear, damage, or negligence. When discussions become difficult or emotionally charged, engaging a neutral third-party assessor or contractor to provide an independent opinion may help both parties better understand the condition of the item and the likely cause of the issue.

To maintain neutrality, the assessment cost can be shared mutually between landlord and tenant.

While such assessments may not be legally binding, they can sometimes help reduce disputes by introducing a more objective and practical perspective, especially for larger claims or technical issues.

In some cases, obtaining a repair quotation alone is insufficient, as quotations typically address the cost of rectification rather than whether the issue should reasonably be classified as wear and tear, damage, or negligence.

When No Agreement Can Be Reached

If both parties cannot resolve the matter privately, the next step is the Small Claims Tribunals. At this point, a Tribunal Magistrate will decide who is right. Importantly, the decision is not based on who sounds more reasonable. It is based entirely on evidence.

The Magistrate will look at the tenancy agreement, the inventory list, the check-in and check-out condition reports, photos, videos, receipts, and any communication records between landlord and tenant. If one side has thorough documentation and the other has nothing but memory and conviction, the outcome is usually predictable.

What the Tribunal will examine:

• The tenancy agreement and any addendums

• Check-in photos and inventory list

• Check-out photos and condition report

• Servicing receipts (especially aircon)

• Email or message records discussing handover

That said, even a successful claim at the Small Claims Tribunals comes with a cost. Filing fees are low — often under fifty dollars — but the real price is measured in hours spent preparing documents, waiting for hearings, and chasing a resolution that could have taken a single calm conversation if expectations had been aligned from the start.

What If the Dispute Still Cannot Be Resolved?

If the matter cannot be resolved even after going through the Small Claims Tribunals (SCT), the next level of escalation is the formal court system.

At this stage, the dispute moves beyond a simplified tribunal process into a full legal proceeding, where:

• Legal representation may be required
• Legal costs can increase significantly
• The process becomes more time-consuming and complex

Unlike SCT, which is designed to be accessible and low-cost, going to court introduces:

• Lawyer fees
• Court fees
• Potential cost orders (the losing party may be required to pay part of the other side’s legal costs)

As disputes escalate, the cost of resolving them often grows faster than the issue itself. By the time legal proceedings are involved, a significant portion of the expense may go towards the process rather than the original problem.

In practical terms, most rental disputes involve relatively modest sums. Escalating the matter further can quickly result in legal costs exceeding the amount in dispute. This is why very few rental handover cases proceed beyond SCT, and most are either settled earlier or concluded at the tribunal stage.

Ultimately, while further escalation is possible, it is rarely the most practical outcome. The further a dispute goes, the higher the cost—in time, money, and stress. The need to attend multiple sessions, prepare documents, and wait for outcomes can itself become a significant burden.

In most situations, these outcomes could have been avoided with clearer expectations, proper documentation, and better preparation before handover.

The Price for Lack of Responsibility

In some cases, tenants may underestimate the level of preparation required, resulting in additional work after handover. This often leads to consequences that many do not anticipate.

When a tenant does not return the unit in the required condition, rectification works may still be needed after handover. In such cases, the landlord is often required to arrange for cleaning or repairs, coordinate with contractors, and provide access to the unit. These are practical steps that take time, effort, and coordination.

While the direct costs of cleaning and repairs are generally claimable and supported by invoices, the additional time spent managing these works should not be overlooked. Tasks such as opening the unit, and supervising rectification involve real commitment and responsibility, especially when they arise because the tenant did not fulfil their obligations.

In such situations, it is reasonable to assign a coordination charge for the time spent managing these processes. A commonly adopted benchmark is $25 to $30 per hour, reflecting the time, effort, and logistical involvement required. This provides a fair and structured way to account for the additional work needed to restore the unit.

As the extent of rectification work increases, the time required for coordination will also increase. Accordingly, manpower charges will scale based on the actual time spent. Where multiple contractor visits, follow-ups, or supervision are required, the overall coordination effort will be higher, resulting in higher total manpower fees.

As with all claims, these charges should be properly documented and directly linked to the tenant’s failure to meet handover requirements. Clear communication and agreement upfront will ensure that such costs are understood and fairly applied, reducing the likelihood of disputes.

The Role of Agents: A Common Misunderstanding

When disagreements arise during handover, it is common for both landlords and tenants to direct frustration toward the property agent. Landlords often expect the agent to step in and resolve issues since they facilitated the original transaction. Tenants, on the other hand, see the agent as the intermediary responsible for managing the handover process.

However, once the Tenancy Agreement is signed, the relationship becomes a direct arrangement between landlord and tenant. The condition of the unit, its maintenance, and its return at the end of the lease are matters between the two parties.

Agents are not responsible for managing the handover process, coordinating cleaners or repairs, opening the unit for contractors, sending appliances for servicing, or settling disputes — unless they are specifically engaged and paid for these additional services.

A professional agent may offer neutral guidance on market practices, clarify what counts as fair wear and tear versus damage, or recommend reliable contractors. You may also engage the agent to assist with tasks such as opening the unit for contractors, but this should be properly arranged and compensated. A reasonable rate commonly used is $25 to $30 per hour.

While an agent may sometimes help as a goodwill gesture, such assistance should not be expected or assumed. Many misunderstandings occur because neither landlords nor tenants clarify the agent’s role upfront. This has soured many handovers, leaving tenants and landlords feeling abandoned, and agents feeling taken advantage of.

What agents can reasonably do:

• Provide neutral guidance and share market practices
• Clarify wear and tear versus damage
• Recommend reliable contractors

What agents are not responsible for:

• Coordinating cleaning or rectification works
• Opening the unit for service providers
• Managing or mediating disputes beyond basic advice

In some situations, landlords may feel that the agent is siding with the tenant, particularly when the agent advises compromise or suggests that certain issues may fall under fair wear and tear. However, many disputes are not entirely black and white. In practice, agents are often trying to reduce escalation, manage expectations, and help both parties reach a practical resolution rather than prolonging conflict unnecessarily.

Key takeaway: Having a clear understanding of each party’s role from the beginning helps prevent unnecessary frustration and keeps the handover process smoother, even when issues arise. A neutral stance by the agent should not be mistaken for taking sides — it is often an effort to reduce escalation and reach a practical resolution.

A Real Case Study 1: When Preparation Is Ignored

In one recent case, a tenant paying $3,300 per month completed a two-year lease and decided not to renew. The landlord had already informed him about the upcoming handover one month in advance, including the expected condition of the unit.

Despite that, when the handover took place, it was clear that very little preparation had been done.

The floors were dirty, the curtains were not washed, and the shelves and cupboards still had visible dust and loose hair. Several ceiling spotlights were not working, while the window grills and tracks were filled with accumulated dirt. The toilet bowl had a leakage issue, and the kitchen tap was loose and not functioning properly, along with several other minor issues.

Individually, each issue may seem minor. But taken together, it meant the unit was far from ready for handover. More importantly, these were not unexpected issues — they were the result of things that could have been addressed but were not.

It was clear from the outset that the landlord was frustrated with the condition of the unit. At the same time, the immediate question raised was straightforward: with advance notice given, why were these issues not resolved before handover?

As a result, the landlord had to arrange professional deep cleaning, send the curtains for dry cleaning, and engage contractors to repair the faulty items. Multiple visits were required to restore the unit to a reasonable condition, with additional time spent coordinating access and overseeing the works.

By the time everything was completed, the total deduction came up to approximately $1,400 — a figure that could have been significantly lower, potentially less than half, if the necessary work had been done before handover.

For a tenant paying $3,300 per month, this is not a small amount — especially when most of it could have been avoided with proper preparation before handover.

The tenant was unhappy with the deductions. However, given the condition in which the unit was returned, there was little room to challenge the outcome.

👉 This is the reality many tenants underestimate — what is not done before handover will eventually be done after, often at a higher cost.

If you don’t do what you are responsible for and expect others to do it for you, you will pay heavily for it.

In the end, what could have been settled smoothly before handover became a post-handover issue, where the outcome was no longer in the tenant’s favour.

A Real Case Study 2: When Expectations Go Too Far

In another case, a dispute arose when the landlord took the position that certain items were not fair wear and tear, but instead damage that should be fully claimed from the tenant.

The disagreement could not be resolved privately and eventually escalated to legal proceedings.

At that stage, the matter moved beyond a simple handover dispute into a full court case, where both sides had to present evidence, documentation, and justification for their claims.

Outcome

The court ultimately ruled against the landlord.

What began as a dispute over relatively minor items resulted in a significantly larger consequence. By the end of the process, the landlord had incurred approximately $20,000 in legal costs, and was also required to bear part of the tenant’s legal expenses.

With multiple sessions, long waiting periods, continuous preparation, and months of frustration, the process became both time-consuming and costly. In the end, even the landlord acknowledged that it was not worth pursuing — a prolonged and costly dispute with little practical benefit.

👉 What started as an attempt to recover value ultimately turned into a situation where far more was lost in the process.

Key Lesson

👉 Not every issue is claimable simply because it appears unsatisfactory.

👉 Fair wear and tear must be properly understood and applied.

👉 Escalating a dispute without a strong and reasonable basis can lead to consequences far greater than the original issue.

Final Thoughts

A rental handover is not simply about handing back a set of keys. It is about whether both parties share the same understanding of what is acceptable. When that understanding is not aligned early — two to four weeks before move-out — minor issues become disputes, and simple handovers become prolonged negotiations.

• For tenants: proper preparation is the only reliable way to protect your deposit.

• For landlords: reasonable expectations are the best way to prevent unnecessary conflict.

• For both: if expectations are only discussed on handover day, the outcome is already compromised.

A smooth handover is rarely achieved through strict enforcement alone, but through reasonable expectations, communication, and proportionality from both parties.

A Personal Reflection

Having been involved in rental transactions over the years, one thing has become very clear to me: many tenancy disputes are not caused by bad intentions, but by mismatched expectations, emotional stress, and the difficulty of defining what is truly “fair”.

I have seen situations where landlords felt taken advantage of, tenants felt unfairly treated, and agents caught in between trying to manage emotions from both sides. In many cases, what starts as a small issue gradually becomes a larger conflict simply because expectations were never properly aligned from the beginning.

Rental handovers are rarely just about cleaning, repairs, or deductions. Very often, they involve emotions, financial pressure, frustration, and differing perspectives on responsibility and fairness.

This is precisely why communication, documentation, reasonableness, and mutual understanding matter so much throughout the tenancy process.

I'm Jerey Han Sin from PropNex, bringing over decades of experience as a seasoned agent. Whether you're considering selling your HDB or condo in Singapore, or renting your property, I'm here to assist you every step of the way.

My expertise spans both residential and commercial properties, ensuring comprehensive support for all your real estate needs. Backed by a dedicated team, we stand ready to provide the assistance you require for a seamless and successful transaction.

If you're unsure what to do next, you can request a professional property and asset planning session before making a decision.

Your property journey is important to us, and I'm committed to making it a smooth and rewarding experience for you.

I hope you enjoyed reading my article. Please note that this is a creative and informative piece of writing, and not professional advice. If you have any questions or feedback, feel free to reach out 😊

Disclaimer: The information presented is intended for general informational purposes only. Homy.sg does not make any representations or warranties regarding the information, and expressly disclaims any warranty as to its fitness for any particular purpose to the fullest extent permitted by law. While we have made every effort to ensure the accuracy, reliability, and completeness of the information at the time of writing, it should not be solely relied upon for making any financial, investment, real estate, or legal decisions. It is advisable to seek advice from a trained professional who can consider your specific facts and circumstances. We accept no liability for any decisions made using the information provided in this article.